R Code and Output Supporting: Do Capture and Survey Methods Influence Whether Marked Animals are Representative of Unmarked Animals?
2015-03-27
Loading...
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsCollection period
2004
2007
2007
Date completed
2015
Date updated
Time period coverage
Geographic coverage
Northeastern Minnesota
Eastern Lynn Canal, Alaska (59 N, 135 W)
Cascade Range, Washington
Olympic Range, Washington
Whatcom County, Washington
Skagit County, Washington
Snohomish County, Washington
Southwestern Washington
Eastern Lynn Canal, Alaska (59 N, 135 W)
Cascade Range, Washington
Olympic Range, Washington
Whatcom County, Washington
Skagit County, Washington
Snohomish County, Washington
Southwestern Washington
Source information
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
R Code and Output Supporting: Do Capture and Survey Methods Influence Whether Marked Animals are Representative of Unmarked Animals?
Published Date
2015-03-27
Authors
Group
Author Contact
Fieberg, John R
jfieberg@umn.edu
jfieberg@umn.edu
Type
Dataset
Map
Software Code
Field Study Data
Map
Software Code
Field Study Data
Abstract
These files contain R code (along with associated output from running the code) supporting all results reported in "Do Capture and Survey Methods Influence Whether Marked Animals are Representative of Unmarked Animals?" in Wildlife Society Bulletin. The lead author wrote this code to analyze multi-year re-sighting data collected from moose (Alces alces) in Minnesota, elk (Cervus elaphus) in Washington, and mountain goats (Oreamnos americanus) in Washington and Alaska, to evaluate whether detection probabilities increased or decreased as a function of time since animals were captured.
Description
The archive consists of 9 files:
1. WA_elk.R = R code used to analyze elk resighting data.
2. WA_elk.html = html output resulting from running the R code in WA_elk.R.
3. Mtg_AK_WA.R = R code used to analyze mountain goat resighting data.
4. Mtg_AK_WA.html = html output resulting from running the R code in Mtg_AK_WA.R.
5. Moose_MN.R = R code used to analyze moose resighting data.
6. Moose_MN.html = html output resulting from running the R code in Moose_MN.R.
7. sightdat.csv = resighting data collected from moose in Minnesota between 2004 and 2007.
8. MTG_Sight_Alaska.csv = resighting data collected from mountain goats in Alaska.
9. NE_MN_Map.pdf = map of collection region for moose resighting data.
Referenced by
Fieberg, J., K. Jenkins, S. McCorquodale, C. G. Rice, G. C. White, and K. White. (2015). Do Capture and Survey Methods Influence Whether Marked Animals are Representative of Unmarked Animals? Wildlife Society Bulletin.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wsb.591
Related to
Replaces
item.page.isreplacedby
Publisher
Collections
Funding information
item.page.sponsorshipfunderid
item.page.sponsorshipfundingagency
item.page.sponsorshipgrant
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
Fieberg, John R; White, Kevin S. (2015). R Code and Output Supporting: Do Capture and Survey Methods Influence Whether Marked Animals are Representative of Unmarked Animals?. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), http://dx.doi.org/10.13020/D6Z597.
View/Download File
File View/Open
Description
Size
README.txt
Description of data and R code
(8.01 KB)
WA_elk.html
R code and associated output supporting the analysis of elk resighting data
(98.76 KB)
WA_elk.R
R code for the analysis of elk resighting data
(8.87 KB)
Moose_MN.html
R code and associated output supporting the analysis of moose resighting data
(54.84 KB)
Moose_MN.R
R code for the analysis of moose resighting data
(5.69 KB)
Mtg_AK_WA.html
R code and associated output supporting the analysis of mountain goat resighting data
(47.99 KB)
Mtg_AK_WA.R
R code for the analysis of mountain goat resighting data
(6.66 KB)
sightdat.csv
Dataset for moose resighting
(3.84 KB)
MTG_Sight_Alaska.csv
Dataset for mountain goat resighting
(14.55 KB)
NE_MN_Map.pdf
Map of collection region for moose resighting data
(104.25 KB)
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.