Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic

Alternative title

Published Date

1977

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

It frequently occurs in psychological research that an investigator is interested in assessing the extent of interrater agreement when the data are measured on an ordinal scale. This monte carlo study demonstrates that the appropriate statistic to apply is weighted kappa with its revised standard error. The study also demonstrates that the minimal number of cases required for the valid application of weighted kappa varies between 20 and 100, depending upon the size of the ordinal scale. This contrasts with a previously cited large sample estimate of 200. Given the difficulty of obtaining sample sizes this large, the latter finding should be of some comfort to investigators who use weighted kappa to measure interrater consensus.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Cicchetti, Domenic V & Fleiss, Joseph L. (1977). Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 195-201. doi:10.1177/014662167700100206

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662167700100206

Suggested citation

Cicchetti, Domenic V.; Fleiss, Joseph L.. (1977). Comparison of the null distributions of weighted kappa and the C ordinal statistic. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/98489.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.