Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020)
Persistent link for this collection
Search within Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020)
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Constitutional Commentary. Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020). Table of contents(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020)Table of contentsItem Against historical practice: facing up to the challenge of informal constitutional change(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) Griffin, Stephen M.Item The structure of interpretive revolutions(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) Telman, D.A. JeremyBook review: Originalism's promise: a natural law account of the American Constitution. By Lee J. Strang. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019. Reviewed by D.A. Jeremy Telman.Item Originalism is a succesful theory (in part) because of its complexity: a response to Professor Telman(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) Strang, Lee J.Response by Lee J. Strang to Professor Telman's review of Strang's book, Originalism's promise (2019). Both the review and the response appear in Constitutional Commentary 35.2.Item Courts and foreign affairs: "their historic role"(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) Ramsey, Michael D.Book review: Restoring the global judiciary: why the Supreme Court should rule in U.S. foreign affairs. By Martin S. Flaherty. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019. Reviewed by Michael D. RamseyItem Liberalism and the distinctiveness of religious belief(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) Greene, Abner S.Book review: Liberalism's religion. By Cécile Laborde. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, 2017. Reviewed by Abner S. GreeneItem Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution(University of Minnesota Law School, 2020) LeDuc, AndréBook review: Fidelity and constraint: how the Supreme Court has read the American Constitution. By Lawrence Lessig. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019; reviewed by André LeDuc