Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution
2020
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
2020
Publisher
University of Minnesota Law School
Type
Article
Abstract
Book review: Fidelity and constraint: how the Supreme Court has read the American Constitution. By Lawrence Lessig. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019; reviewed by André LeDuc
Keywords
Description
1 online resource (PDF, page 241-299)
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020), page 241-299
Other identifiers
Suggested citation
LeDuc, André. (2020). Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217034.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.