Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution

Published Date

2020

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Type

Article

Abstract

Book review: Fidelity and constraint: how the Supreme Court has read the American Constitution. By Lawrence Lessig. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019; reviewed by André LeDuc

Keywords

Description

1 online resource (PDF, page 241-299)

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Constitutional Commentary, Volume 35, Number 2 (Summer 2020), page 241-299

Suggested citation

LeDuc, André. (2020). Who is to be master: accounting for how the Supreme Court reads the American Constitution. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/217034.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.