Scoping in Environmental Review for Transportation Projects: A Study of NEPA Scoping Methods and Outcomes in State Departments of Transportation
Published Date
Publisher
Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota
Type
Abstract
This report summarizes the findings of a study of scoping processes conducted in state departments of transportation (DOTs) in the U.S. The study focused specifically on scoping conducted as part of implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for various types of transportation projects. The intent was to identify variation in approaches to scoping in DOTs across the U.S. and to identify the outcomes of scoping on later steps in the environmental review process, through the use of an online survey methodology. In addition, the study asked state DOTs to evaluate their own approaches to scoping. To supplement the national review of scoping practices, four case studies of recent scoping processes conducted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) were completed. The key findings of the study provide insights into the range of approaches used for scoping in state departments of transportation, as well as valuable information about the influence of scoping efforts in environmental review.
Description
Related to
item.page.replaces
License
Collections
Series/Report Number
CTS 08-04
Funding Information
Center for Transportation Studies,
University of Minnesota
item.page.isbn
DOI identifier
Previously Published Citation
Other identifiers
Suggested Citation
Slotterback, Carissa Schively; Sloper, Susan. (2008). Scoping in Environmental Review for Transportation Projects: A Study of NEPA Scoping Methods and Outcomes in State Departments of Transportation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/151662.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.
