Becoming Responsible: Conceptual Change in the Emergence of Tort Law

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Becoming Responsible: Conceptual Change in the Emergence of Tort Law

Published Date

2015-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Classic conceptions of how law, politics, and morality relate to one another argue that moral and political goals drive legal innovation and practice. This dissertation argues that the classic conception is flawed because legal practices can supersede the moral and political goals they originally set out to accomplish and this has consequences for political and moral discourses. Through archival research in the little-investigated history of tort law, this project uncovers how the moral concept of responsibility developed in tandem with the legal technology of tort law and how the original asymmetries between the moral concept and the legal technology were leveraged by the legal profession to create a set of far reaching practices that governed independently of moral justification. My dissertation argues that through the legal evolution of the concept of responsibility, tort law acquired its present dual role as both codified law and social discipline.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2015. Major: Political Science. Advisor: Joan Tronto. 1 computer file (PDF); iii, 225 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Goltz, Caleb. (2015). Becoming Responsible: Conceptual Change in the Emergence of Tort Law. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/177165.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.