A comparison of models for detecting discrimination: An example from medical school admissions

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

A comparison of models for detecting discrimination: An example from medical school admissions

Alternative title

Published Date

1984

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Detecting bias in admissions to graduate and professional schools presents important problems to the data analyst. In this paper some traditionally used methods, such as multiple regression analysis, are compared with the newer methods of logistic regression and structural equations models. The problems faced in modeling decision rules in this situation are (1) a dichotomous dependent variable, (2) nonlinear relationships between independent variables and the probability of being admitted, (3) omitted variables, and (4) errors in variables. Each method used involves an attempt to solve one or more of these problems, but each has its own drawbacks. Using multiple methods, and finding several areas of agreement in the results among the methods, makes the conclusions stronger than had only one method been used.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Rindskopf, David & Everson, Howard. (1984). A comparison of models for detecting discrimination: An example from medical school admissions. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 89-106. doi:10.1177/014662168400800110

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168400800110

Suggested citation

Rindskopf, David; Everson, Howard. (1984). A comparison of models for detecting discrimination: An example from medical school admissions. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101878.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.