Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories

Alternative title

Published Date

1981

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

An individual difference hypothesis was tested with respect to the validity of a vector type cognitive processing model for inventory responses. The validity index may be also considered an index of the conformity of inventory responses to the meaning structure of the items. Three short adjective and sentence type inventories were used, two of them consisting of mixed sets of items and one consisting of positive sets. It was concluded from the only low positive intercorrelations of the validities that individual differences are minor. Furthermore, evidence was found for an effect of the order of presentation of the inventories and for an effect of the inventory composition (positive or mixed), but not for a higher validity of the model for adjective than for sentence types of inventories.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

De Boeck, Paul. (1981). Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 481-492. doi:10.1177/014662168100500406

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168100500406

Suggested citation

De Boeck, Paul. (1981). Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/100421.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.