Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories
1981
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1981
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
An individual difference hypothesis was tested
with respect to the validity of a vector type cognitive
processing model for inventory responses. The validity
index may be also considered an index of the
conformity of inventory responses to the meaning
structure of the items. Three short adjective and
sentence type inventories were used, two of them
consisting of mixed sets of items and one consisting
of positive sets. It was concluded from the only low
positive intercorrelations of the validities that individual
differences are minor. Furthermore, evidence
was found for an effect of the order of presentation
of the inventories and for an effect of the inventory
composition (positive or mixed), but not for a
higher validity of the model for adjective than for
sentence types of inventories.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
De Boeck, Paul. (1981). Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 481-492. doi:10.1177/014662168100500406
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168100500406
Suggested citation
De Boeck, Paul. (1981). Individual differences in the validity of a cognitive processing model for responses to personality inventories. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/100421.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.