Behavioral Measures for 48 Participants in Work-Zone Messaging Driving Simulation Study collected in 2016 at the University of Minnesota

Loading...

Persistent link to this item

https://doi.org/10.13020/D6610M
https://hdl.handle.net/11299/195803

Statistics

View Statistics

Keywords

driving simulation

human factors

Collection period

7/15/16
8/24/16

Date completed

2012-09

Date updated

Time period coverage

Geographic coverage

Source information

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Behavioral Measures for 48 Participants in Work-Zone Messaging Driving Simulation Study collected in 2016 at the University of Minnesota

Published Date

2018-04-18

Authors

Craig, Curtis, M

Morris, Nichole L

Group

University of Minnesota HumanFIRST Lab

Author Contact

Morris, Nichole, L
nlmorris@umn.edu

Type

Dataset
Experimental Data

Abstract

This study explored the impact of in-vehicle messages to alert drivers to events within a simulated work zone. Participants used a partial motion-based driving simulator made by Realtime Technologies, Inc. Data variables include speed, speed deviation, lane standard deviation, and eye-tracking fixation counts. The data is provided here for reasons of transparency and verification.

Description

The data files are comma separated values (.csv) files that can be opened in Excel and similar spreadhsheet programs. There are three files, comprising speed and speed variation data, lane deviation data, and eye tracking fixation counts on the messaging interface. For the driving performance variables, CN, CS, AN, AS, AVN, and AVS all refer to Control (PCMS) Northbound (Shoulder Work work zone), Control Southbound (Lane Closure work zone), Audio-only interface northbound, audio-only southbound, audio-visual interface northbound, and audiovisual southbound. Position indicates the placement of the smartphone interface, with 1 reflecting dashboard placement, and 2 reflecting passenger seat placement. Events reflect messaging events in the simulated work zone. Finally, in the eye-tracking dataset, position 1 and 2 is the same as the other data sets, while Interface 1 is control/PCMS, 2 is audio-only, 3 is audio-visual. DriveBound 1 is northbound/shoulderwork, and DriveBound 2 is southbound/laneclosure. TotalN is number of fixations on interface.

Referenced by

Related to

Replaces

License

CC0 1.0 Universal
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Publisher

Collections

Data Repository for U of M (DRUM)

Funding information

MnDOT Contract Number 99008, Work Order Number 184

item.page.sponsorshipfunderid

item.page.sponsorshipfundingagency

item.page.sponsorshipgrant

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Craig, Curtis, M; Morris, Nichole L. (2018). Behavioral Measures for 48 Participants in Work-Zone Messaging Driving Simulation Study collected in 2016 at the University of Minnesota. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), https://doi.org/10.13020/D6610M.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.