Evaluation of the efficiency of item calibration

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Evaluation of the efficiency of item calibration

Published Date

1988

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

This study compared several IRT calibration procedures to determine which procedure, if any, consistently produced the most accurate item parameter estimates. A new criterion of calibration efficiency was used for evaluating the calibration procedures; this criterion considers the joint effects of individual item parameter errors as they relate to the accuracy of &thetas; estimation. Four methods of item calibration were evaluated: (1) heuristic estimates obtained from transformations of traditional item statistics; (2) ANCILLES, a program that first fits the c parameter and then transforms traditional item statistics to IRT a and b parameters ; (3) LOGIST, a joint maximum likelihood procedure ; and (4) ASCAL, a modification of LOGIST’S algorithm which applies Bayesian priors to the abilities and item parameters. These were compared with each other and with a constant item parameter baseline condition. ASCAL and LOGIST produced estimates of essentially equivalent accuracy, although ASCAL’s estimates of the c parameters were slightly superior. The heuristic estimates and those from ANCILLES were generally poor in comparison, particularly for smaller sample sizes. Index terms: Calibration efficiency, Item calibration, Item parameter estimation, Item response theory, Latent trait models.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Vale, C. David & Gialluca, Kathleen A. (1988). Evaluation of the efficiency of item calibration. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 53-67. doi:10.1177/014662168801200106

Suggested citation

Vale, C. David; Gialluca, Kathleen A.. (1988). Evaluation of the efficiency of item calibration. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/104156.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.