Scales of Airport Expansion: Globalization, Regionalization, and Local Land Use

2004-07-01
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Scales of Airport Expansion: Globalization, Regionalization, and Local Land Use

Published Date

2004-07-01

Publisher

Type

Abstract

This study examines two main issues surrounding the increasing demand for airport capacity: the effects of globalization and transportation on each other as expressed through local land use, and the politics of scale in struggles over airport expansion. The study centers around three case studies to illustrate how globalization, air transportation, and local land use are connected at the municipal, metropolitan, and regional levels. Each case study investigates a specific issue. The Minneapolis-St. Paul (MSP) case investigates the geographical distribution of economic impacts of the airport. The Chicago (ORD) case documents the changing land uses over time around O'Hare, as well as a detailed investigation of the current land use controversy in the vicinity of an expanding airport. The Boston (BOS) case study examines the regionally-based solution to airport demand, specifically the attempts to encourage passengers to use smaller regional airports in the area instead of the crowded Logan Airport in Boston.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Center for Transportation Studies

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Cidell, Julie. (2004). Scales of Airport Expansion: Globalization, Regionalization, and Local Land Use. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/1025.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.