Alternative Dairy Technologies: A Comparison of Unit, Cost, Net Return and Investment.

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Alternative Dairy Technologies: A Comparison of Unit, Cost, Net Return and Investment.

Published Date

1968

Publisher

Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station

Type

Newsletter or Bulletin

Abstract

Description

This study compares several alternative dairy housing, milking, and feeding facilities with respect to gross income produced, cost per dollar of gross income, net returns to the operator's labor and management, and investment capital requirements. The comparisons are made within the context of a complete farm organization so that differences in technologies used are reflected in their effect -on a total farm situation. 27 pages. This archival publication may not reflect current scientific knowledge or recommendations. Current information available from University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station: http://www.maes.umn.edu/

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

This bulletin was produced in cooperation with Farm Production Economics Division, Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Buxton, Boyd M. 1968. Alternative dairy technologies: a comparison of unit, cost,net return and investment. Saint Paul, MN: University of Minnesota, Agricultural Experiment Station, Bulletin 490.

Suggested citation

Buxton, Boyd M.. (1968). Alternative Dairy Technologies: A Comparison of Unit, Cost, Net Return and Investment.. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/163847.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.