Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change
Title
Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change
Alternative title
Published Date
1984
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Alpha, beta, and gamma change concerning student
attitudes toward a college course were assessed before
and after the first examination in that course for an experimental
and control group. Three methodologies
were used to assess change. Those proposed by Terborg,
Howard, and Maxwell (1980) and Schmitt
(1982) produced reasonably similar conclusions concerning
change, while the methodology suggested by
Zmud and Armenakis (1978) produced relatively different
conclusions. The relative advantages and limitations
of the procedures are discussed. The major conclusion
is that much additional use and comparison of
these methodologies for assessing change is necessary
before researchers or practitioners can interpret the
practical significance of beta and gamma change or the
relative utility of various approaches to the measurement
of beta and gamma change.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Schmitt, Neal W, Pulakos, Elaine D & Lieblein, Amy. (1984). Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 249-260. doi:10.1177/014662168400800301
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168400800301
Suggested citation
Schmitt, Neal; Pulakos, Elaine D.; Lieblein, Amy. (1984). Comparison of three techniques to assess group-level beta and gamma change. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101909.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.