Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study

Loading...

View/Download File

So et al 2024b.pdf (194.6 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/263169

Statistics

View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study

Authors

So, Marvin

Jadoo, Hailie

Stong, Jennifer

Klemenhagen, Kristen

Philbrick, Ann

Freeman, Kathryn

Published Date

2024-05-02

Publisher

Journal of Primary Care & Community Health

Type

Article

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this pilot study was to explore the impact of interpreter format (virtual vs in person) on clinical outcomes in patients with non-English language preference (NELP) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in a primary care setting. We hypothesized that NELP patients utilizing in person interpreters would have improved HbA1c values, better follow-up rate, and more complex care plans compared to patients utilizing virtual interpreters. Methods: We completed a retrospective chart review of 137 NELP patients with T2DM who required a medical interpreter (February to June 2021). We calculated univariate and bivariate statistics to characterize the sample and assess the extent to which measures of continuity (follow-up visit rate and time to follow-up visit), quality (change in HbA1c), and complexity (medication intervention complexity) were associated with interpreter type. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in follow-up rate or average days to follow-up visit for NELP patients with in person as opposed to virtual interpreters. Patients with virtual interpreters demonstrated a non-statistically significant decrease in HbA1c compared to those with in person interpreters. Finally, there was no statistically significant association between interpreter format and intervention complexity. Conclusions: Quality medical interpretation contributes to optimal health outcomes in NELP patients with diabetes. Our study suggests that both in person and virtual interpreters can be effective in providing care for NELP patients, especially for chronic disease management in the context of a primary care relationship. It also highlights the importance of pursuing additional qualitative and mixed method studies to better understand the benefits of various interpreter formats across different visit types.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Articles and Scholarly Works

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

10.1177/21501319241240347

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

So, Marvin; Jadoo, Hailie; Stong, Jennifer; Klemenhagen, Kristen; Philbrick, Ann; Freeman, Kathryn. (2024). Effect of Virtual Versus In Person Interpreting on Diabetes Outcomes in Non-English Language Preference Patients: A Pilot Study. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, 10.1177/21501319241240347.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.