Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses)

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Keywords

Collection period

2021-11-01
2022-04-30

Date completed

Date updated

Time period coverage

Geographic coverage

Source information

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses)

Published Date

2022-09-08

Author Contact

Theis-Mahon, Nicole
theis025@umn.edu

Type

Dataset

Abstract

Data consists of two csv files for a set of 310 systematic reviews/evidence syntheses (methods of identification outlined in Brown et al.) Methodological quality of the systematic review/evidence synthesis was assessed using AMSTAR 2 criteria. Citation meaning was assessed using previous mapping of the Retraction Watch Database’s reason for retraction to a modified version of Bar Ilan and Halevi’s taxonomy of reasons for retraction. Image attribution: The image for this record is by Mohamed Mb and can be found on The Noun Project at https://thenounproject.com/icon/error-1678343/.

Description

Referenced by

Related to

Replaces

item.page.isreplacedby

Publisher

Funding information

item.page.sponsorshipfunderid

item.page.sponsorshipfundingagency

item.page.sponsorshipgrant

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Bakker, Caitlin; Theis-Mahon, Nicole; Brown, Sarah Jane. (2022). Data underlying (The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses). Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), https://hdl.handle.net/11299/241503.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.