Prudential measures in housing access: Should one include transport costs in the front-end ratio?

Coulombel, Nicolas

2017

View/Download File

JTLU_vol10no1_pp627-654.pdf (1.86 MB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/191046

Statistics

View Statistics

Title

Prudential measures in housing access: Should one include transport costs in the front-end ratio?

Authors

Coulombel, Nicolas

Published Date

2017

Publisher

Journal of Transport and Land Use

Type

Article

Abstract

A widespread prudential measure limits the housing expense ratio—defined as the share of income spent on the rent or loan payment—to ensure household solvency. This policy is increasingly criticized, however, as it would induce households to settle far from the city center in search of lower housing prices, fostering urban sprawl. It would even prove counterproductive as high transport costs in distant areas would more than offset the lower housing costs. To avoid these unintended effects, several researchers advocate limiting the joint housing plus transport expense ratio instead. This paper aims to shed light on this issue by comparing the two prudential measures—limiting either the housing or the housing plus transport expense ratio—using the monocentric model. By constraining residential choices and reducing housing consumption, both policies improve household solvency and reduce urban sprawl. While this seems to contradict previous claims, the joint constraint proves more efficient in both regards. Provided the constraint is not too stringent, both policies have limited impact on household welfare and often even improve welfare. But this time, capping only the housing expense ratio always dominates the joint housing plus transport constraint. A numerical application to the Paris region illustrates our findings for a real case study. Results suggest that replacing the current limitation of the housing expense ratio with a joint housing plus transport constraint would significantly improve household solvency and curb urban sprawl, with a negligible welfare loss.

Keywords

Prudential measures

Monocentric model

Collections

JTLU Volume 10, No. 1 (2017)

Doi identifier

10.5198/jtlu.2017.849

Suggested citation

Coulombel, Nicolas. (2017). Prudential measures in housing access: Should one include transport costs in the front-end ratio?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, 10.5198/jtlu.2017.849.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.