Commentary on the Commentaries of Collins and Humphreys

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Commentary on the Commentaries of Collins and Humphreys

Published Date

1996

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

The critiques of Collins (1996) and Humphreys (1996) certainly throw light on properties of gain scores and difference scores that have led to controversies in the past. Collins’ examples reveal that familiar formulas for the reliability of differences do not adequately reflect the precision of measures of change, because they do not allow for intraindividual change. Some additional examples are provided here, and a similar argument is applied to the reliability of a single test. As Collins implies, these arguments indeed disclose flaws, not only in the conventional approach to the reliability of gains and differences, but also in the basic concept of reliability in classical test theory. Index terms: change scores, classical test theory, difference scores, gain scores, intraindividual differences, measurement of growth, reliability, test theory, validity.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Williams, Richard H & Zimerman, Donald W. (1996). Are simple gain scores obsolete: Commentary on the commentaries of Collins and Humphreys. Applied Psychological Measurement, 20, 295-297. doi:10.1177/014662169602000310

Suggested citation

Williams, Richard H.; Zimmerman, Donald W.. (1996). Commentary on the Commentaries of Collins and Humphreys. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/119463.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.