Behavioral expectation scales versus nonanchored and trait rating systems: A sales personnel application

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Behavioral expectation scales versus nonanchored and trait rating systems: A sales personnel application

Alternative title

Published Date

1980

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

There are presently available several empirical comparisons between behavioral expectation scales (BES) and other rating scales (Bernardin, 1977; Borman & Dunnette, 1975; Burnaska & Hollman, 1974; Keaveny & McGann, 1975). In many of these studies the rater-ratee population has consisted of faculty members and students (Bernardin, 1977; Keaveny & McGann, 1975; Schwab, Heneman, & Decotiis, 1975). Only a handful of scientifically sound investigations comparing BES and other rating scales have used manager-subordinate populations. The importance of sales personnel in organizations, the general lack of previous research using sales employees as subjects in examining BES, and the significance of performance evaluation prompted the present study. Specifically, the study examined estimates of rating leniency, halo error, interrater agreement, and the degree of ratee differentiation of BES, nonanchored, and trait evaluation systems.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Ivancevich, John M. (1980). Behavioral expectation scales versus nonanchored and trait rating systems: A sales personnel application. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 131-133. doi:10.1177/014662168000400113

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168000400113

Suggested citation

Ivancevich, John M.. (1980). Behavioral expectation scales versus nonanchored and trait rating systems: A sales personnel application. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/100019.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.