Validity generalization and situational specificity: An analysis of the prediction of first-year grades in law school

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Validity generalization and situational specificity: An analysis of the prediction of first-year grades in law school

Published Date

1981

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Results from 726 validity studies were analyzed to determine the degree of validity generalization of the Law School Admission Test for predicting first-year grades in law school. Four validity generalization procedures were used and their results compared. As much as 70% of the variance in observed validity coefficients could be accounted for by differences in the within-study variability of LSAT scores, simple sampling error, and between-study differences in criterion reliability. The 90% credibility value for the true validities was estimated to be .45, and the average true validity was estimated to be .54. Despite the substantial degree of validity generalization, law school and the year the study was conducted explained significant portions of the residual variance in validities. Thus, some degree of situational specificity of validity remained.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Linn, Robert L, Harnisch, Delwyn L & Dunbar, Stephen B. (1981). Validity generalization and situational specificity: An analysis of the prediction of first-year grades in law school. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 281-289. doi:10.1177/014662168100500301

Suggested citation

Linn, Robert L.; Harnisch, Delwyn L.; Dunbar, Stephen B.. (1981). Validity generalization and situational specificity: An analysis of the prediction of first-year grades in law school. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/100383.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.