Innovative Assessments for Preclinical Competencies in a Veterinary Surgery Course: How Would You Dehorn a Unicorn?

Published Date

Publisher

Education in the Health Professions

Abstract

This report describes an innovative final examination structure that has allowed students to demonstrate several competencies as part of a veterinary surgery course, including collaboration, communication, and scholarship. The assessment includes two exams: one assessing individual student knowledge and the other a group case-based examination. The latter permits not only assessment of knowledge application but also group function, resource finding and utilization, and either written or verbal communication skills. A provided instructor key and group reflection make grading efficient. External audiences encourage practice in communication skills, while unusual patients facilitate full group involvement. The assessment format aligns with course goals, has similar organization time compared to standard final exams, and requires minimal grading effort. We feel this model could be readily extended to other facets of veterinary medicine as well as to other health professions.

Description

Related to

item.page.replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding Information

item.page.isbn

DOI identifier

10.4103/EHP.EHP_12_23

Previously Published Citation

Malone ED. Innovative assessments for preclinical competencies in a veterinary surgery course: How would you dehorn a unicorn? Educ Health Prof 2023;6:84-91.

Other identifiers

Suggested Citation

Malone, Erin. (2023). Innovative Assessments for Preclinical Competencies in a Veterinary Surgery Course: How Would You Dehorn a Unicorn?. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, 10.4103/EHP.EHP_12_23.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.