Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices
Authors
Published Date
1986
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Procedures for analyzing multitrait-multimethod
(MTMM) matrices are reviewed. Confirmatory factor
analysis (Jöreskog, 1974) is presented as a general
model allowing evaluation of the discriminant and
convergent validity of MTMM matrices, both as a
whole and in individual trait-method units. However,
it is noted that this model is deficient with regard to
analysis of trait-method interactions of the type described
by Campbell and O’Connell (1967, 1982).
Composite direct product models described by Browne
(1984) are one possible solution to this problem. Further,
more systematic use of hypothesis testing regarding
convergent and discriminant validity in nested hierarchical
models is recommended (Widaman, 1985),
as well as the use of a procedure to cross-validate
models of MTMM matrices described by Cudeck and
Browne (1983).
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Schmitt, Neal & Stults, Daniel M. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 1-22. doi:10.1177/014662168601000101
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168601000101
Suggested citation
Schmitt, Neal; Stults, Daniel M.. (1986). Methodology review: Analysis of multitrait-multimethod matrices. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102256.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.