Higher Education Governing Boards and Stakeholder Governance of Intercollegiate Athletics

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Higher Education Governing Boards and Stakeholder Governance of Intercollegiate Athletics

Published Date

2015-12

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Governing boards of higher education institutions are responsible for governance actions such as appointing and evaluating the president, clarifying institutional mission, ensuring financial solvency, and preserving institutional independence. Typically not included within these responsibilities is the oversight of intercollegiate athletics (ICA), which is primarily delegated to institutional presidents. Thus, many trustees are uncertain about their role in the governance of ICA. Semi-structured interviews with 29 trustees from 23 different governing boards were conducted to provide a first-hand account of trustee perspectives on their role in providing oversight to ICA. Data were analyzed through an ad hoc approach where it was found that trustees were generally supportive of athletics while being concerned about the overemphasis compared to other aspects of institutional mission. They also had mixed viewpoints on the effectiveness of formalized board structures and processes around athletic governance, stressed the importance of trust in administrative leadership and informal consultation processes, and were challenged by the financial realities of supporting Division I athletics and the external spheres of power in college sports. The study contributed to the literature on stakeholder theory by examining how governing boards, as the stakeholders with ultimate fiduciary responsibility for institutions, provide oversight to an area of higher education with an extremely high profile and considerable financial and reputational risk. The study also contributed to the understanding of shared governance in higher education by analyzing how governing boards effectively assert authority in a high profile area of institutional governance. Implications for policy and practice included the importance of governing boards developing clear expectations with presidents about which athletic issues require board consultation and which require formal board approval.

Description

University of Minnesota Ph.D. dissertation. December 2015. Major: Kinesiology. Advisor: Lisa Kihl. 1 computer file (PDF); x, 191 pages.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Steadland, Jon. (2015). Higher Education Governing Boards and Stakeholder Governance of Intercollegiate Athletics. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/177094.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.