Precision, speed, and distraction in time-limit tests
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Precision, speed, and distraction in time-limit tests
Alternative title
Published Date
1982
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Three models are presented that account for the
effects of speed and precision in mental test scores
as measured by time-limit intelligence tests. To estimate
precision, it is shown that the Rasch model-
and, as a special case, the binomial error model
-can be used, focusing on the number of items
correct and the number of items attempted (usually
considered as estimators of these effects). To estimate
speed, a model called the Poisson-Erlang
model is presented. It is shown that speed can be
analyzed into two components: processing time and
distraction time. Parameters of the
Poisson-Erlang
model are used to estimate these components. An
outline is given of a new method for analyzing
time-limit tests, combining the different models. In
addition, it is shown that the
Poisson-Erlang model
can be used to account for response latencies commonly
observed in mental concentration tests.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Pieters, Jo P & Van der Ven, Ad H. (1982). Precision, speed, and distraction in time-limit tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 93-109. doi:10.1177/014662168200600110
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168200600110
Suggested citation
Pieters, Jo P. M.; Van der Ven, Ad H. G. S.. (1982). Precision, speed, and distraction in time-limit tests. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101370.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.