Modeling guessing behavior: A comparison of two IRT models
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Modeling guessing behavior: A comparison of two IRT models
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1989
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
This study compared the fit of the three-parameter
model to that of the Ability Removing Random
Guessing (ARRG) model (Waller, 1973) on data from a
wide range of tests of cognitive ability in three representative
samples. Although both models were designed
to remove only the effects of random guessing,
the results of this study indicated that the three-parameter
model also makes an adjustment for partial-knowledge
guessing. Fit of the three-parameter model
with guessing parameters estimated at a constant value
of 1 divided by the number of alternatives was compared
to fit with individually estimated guessing parameters.
The latter were found to produce fit far superior
to those estimated at a constant value. A
solution to the convergence problems often encountered
with the three-parameter model is discussed.
Index terms: Ability Removing Random Guessing
model, convergence in three-parameter estimation
procedures, item response theory, maximum likelihood
estimation, partial-knowledge guessing, random
guessing.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Waller, Michael I. (1989). Modeling guessing behavior: A comparison of two IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 233-243. doi:10.1177/014662168901300302
Other identifiers
doi::10.1177/014662168901300302
Suggested citation
Waller, Michael I.. (1989). Modeling guessing behavior: A comparison of two IRT models. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107312.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.