Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Sex differences in item responses on the Graduate Record Examination

Donlon, Thomas F.
Hicks, Marilyn M.
Wallmark, Madeline M.
1980
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

v04n1p009.pdf (666.85 KB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99949
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Sex differences in item responses on the Graduate Record Examination

Authors

Published Date

1980

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

This study explores the scope and nature of sex differences in the December 1974 aptitude tests of the Graduate Record Examination by identifying individual test items that differ from the other items in terms of the magnitude of the difference in item difficulty for the sexes. The method is that’ used in earlier studies by Angoff and Stern (1971) and by Strassberg-Rosenberg and Donlon (1975). In general, limited evidence of sex differences was established.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Applied Psychological Measurement, Volume 04, 1980

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Donlon, Thomas F, Hicks, Marilyn M & Wallmark, Madeline M. (1980). Sex differences in item responses on the Graduate Record Examination. Applied Psychological Measurement, 4, 9-20. doi:10.1177/014662168000400103

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168000400103

Suggested citation

Donlon, Thomas F.; Hicks, Marilyn M.; Wallmark, Madeline M.. (1980). Sex differences in item responses on the Graduate Record Examination. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99949.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.