Appropriateness fit and criterion-related validity

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Appropriateness fit and criterion-related validity

Published Date

1993

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Unmotivated or suspicious test takers in concurrent validation studies can cause numerous problems for test users. The effects of these problems, however, have not been carefully examined. This study used item response theory-based appropriateness fit indexes to identify and remove from a validation sample those examinees whose response patterns did not match their trait levels (e.g., examinees with low trait levels who answered difficult items correctly). The person-fit index lzm described in Drasgow, Levine, & Williams (1985) had little effect on validities. The multitest index lzm described by Drasgow & Hulin (1990) was more promising. Implications for selection research and practice are discussed. Index terms: aberrant response patterns, appropriateness fit, concurrent validity, distorted responses, item response theory, person fit.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Schmitt, Neal, Cortina, Jose M & Whitney, David J. (1993). Appropriateness fit and criterion-related validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 143-150. doi:10.1177/014662169301700204

Suggested citation

Schmitt, Neal; Cortina, José M.; Whitney, David J.. (1993). Appropriateness fit and criterion-related validity. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/116322.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.