A comparison of three linear equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
A comparison of three linear equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1989
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Three linear equating methods for the common-item
nonequivalent-populations design are compared using
an analytical method. The analysis investigated the behavior
of the three methods when the true-score correlation
between the test and anchor was less than unity,
a situation that may occur in practice. The analysis is
graphically illustrated using data from a test equating
situation. Conclusions derived from the analysis have
implications for the practical application of these
equating methods. Index terms: congeneric model,
Levine equating method, linear equating, Tucker
equating method.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Woodruff, David J. (1989). A comparison of three linear equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 257-261. doi:10.1177/014662168901300305
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168901300305
Suggested citation
Woodruff, David J.. (1989). A comparison of three linear equating methods for the common-item nonequivalent-populations design. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107319.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.