Licensing Practices of Libraries and Content Providers, Survey Instrument

Title

Licensing Practices of Libraries and Content Providers, Survey Instrument

Published Date

2017

Publisher

Type

Other

Abstract

This survey tool was designed to assess the current licensing practices and the adoption of NISO's Shared E-Resource Understanding (SERU) by libraries and publishers. The survey of librarians and publishers with licensing responsibilities intended to answer the following research questions: ● How many libraries use SERU? ● How often is SERU used in place of a negotiated, signed license? ● What proportion of e-resource acquisitions are covered by SERU? ● Do libraries advocate for SERU when speaking with publishers? If so, how often and in what way? ● What are the reasons why a library would not use SERU? ● How much do libraries suggest changes to vendor provided licenses? ● How much licensing/negotiation support do libraries have access to, whether that be licensing librarians or general counsel? ● Who does the negotiation for academic libraries? The survey was in English and completed online.

Keywords

Description

The document contains the survey tool, as created in Qualtrics, exported as PDF and Word (.docx) documents. It shows the question numbers, survey logic and coded values. The HTML tags are stripped from all questions and answers and the dropdown choices are condensed.

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Carter, Sunshine J. (2017). Licensing Practices of Libraries and Content Providers, Survey Instrument. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/204083.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.