DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: A framework for classification and evaluation
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: A framework for classification and evaluation
Authors
Published Date
1995
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Increased use of alternatives to the traditional dichotomously
scored multiple-choice item yield complex
responses that require complex scoring rules.
Some of these new item types can be polytomously
scored. DIF methodology is well-defined for traditional
dichotomously scored multiple-choice items.
This paper provides a classification scheme of DIF
procedures for dichotomously scored items that is
applicable to new DIF procedures for polytomously
scored items. In the process, a formal development of
a polytomous version of a dichotomous DIF technique
is presented. Several polytomous DIF techniques are
evaluated in terms of statistical and practical
criteria. Index terms: DIF methodology, differential
item functioning, item bias, polytomous scoring, statistical
criteria for differential item functioning.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Potenza, Maria T & Dorans, Neil J. (1995). DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: A framework for classification and evaluation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 23-37. doi:10.1177/014662169501900104
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662169501900104
Suggested citation
Potenza, Maria T.; Dorans, Neil J.. (1995). DIF assessment for polytomously scored items: A framework for classification and evaluation. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/117417.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.