individual differences in unfolding preference data: A restricted latent class approach
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
individual differences in unfolding preference data: A restricted latent class approach
Authors
Published Date
1990
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
A latent class scaling approach is presented for
modeling paired comparison and "pick-any/t"
data obtained in a preference study. Although the
latent class part of the model identifies homogeneous
subgroups that are characterized by their
choice probabilities for a set of alternatives, the
scaling part of the model describes the single peakedness
structure of the choice data. Procedures
are suggested for examining the unfolding structure
in an unrestricted latent class solution. Two
applications are presented to illustrate the technique.
In the first application, scaling solutions obtained
from a latent class scaling model and a marginal
maximum likelihood latent trait model are compared.
Index terms: latent class analysis, paired
comparison data, pick any/t data, unfolding models.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Bockenholt, Ulf & Bockenholt, Ingo. (1990). Modeling individual differences in unfolding preference data: A restricted latent class approach. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 257-269. doi:10.1177/014662169001400304
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662169001400304
Suggested citation
Böckenholt, Ulf; Böckenholt, Ingo. (1990). individual differences in unfolding preference data: A restricted latent class approach. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/113602.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.