Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1987
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Many of the articles on equating that have appeared
during the last 35 years have been concerned
with the development and exposition of alternative
models of equating, their error functions, and their
robustness in the face of violations of the assumptions
basic to their development. The four papers
presented here are somewhat different. Their purpose,
generally, is to go beyond theory, to examine
the implications of special problems observed in
the application of equating methodology, to search
for clarifications and improvements in technique,
and to investigate ways in which equating methods
may be applied to practical testing problems. Each
paper addresses a different set of problems; the
present discussion will not attempt to find common
issues among them, but will consider each
separately
in serial order.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Angoff, William H. (1987). Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 291-300. doi:10.1177/014662168701100306
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168701100306
Suggested citation
Angoff, William H.. (1987). Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/104065.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.