Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers

Alternative title

Published Date

1987

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Many of the articles on equating that have appeared during the last 35 years have been concerned with the development and exposition of alternative models of equating, their error functions, and their robustness in the face of violations of the assumptions basic to their development. The four papers presented here are somewhat different. Their purpose, generally, is to go beyond theory, to examine the implications of special problems observed in the application of equating methodology, to search for clarifications and improvements in technique, and to investigate ways in which equating methods may be applied to practical testing problems. Each paper addresses a different set of problems; the present discussion will not attempt to find common issues among them, but will consider each separately in serial order.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Angoff, William H. (1987). Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 291-300. doi:10.1177/014662168701100306

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168701100306

Suggested citation

Angoff, William H.. (1987). Technical and practical issues in equating: A discussion of four papers. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/104065.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.