Effort Versus Reward: Preparing samples for fungal community characterization in high-throughput sequencing surveys of soils

Thumbnail Image
View Statistics

Collection period


Date completed


Date updated

Time period coverage

Geographic coverage

Source information

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title


Effort Versus Reward: Preparing samples for fungal community characterization in high-throughput sequencing surveys of soils

Published Date



Author Contact

Song, Zewei


Experimental Data
Genomics Data


Next generation fungal amplicon sequencing is being used with increasing frequency to study fungal diversity in various ecosystems; however, the influence of sample preparation on the characterization of fungal community is poorly understood. We investigated the effects of four procedural modifications to library preparation for high-throughput sequencing (HTS). The following treatments were considered: 1) the amount of soil used in DNA extraction, 2) the inclusion of additional steps (freeze/thaw cycles, sonication, or hot water bath incubation) in the extraction procedure, 3) the amount of DNA template used in polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 4) the effect of sample pooling, either physically or computationally. Soils from two different ecosystems in Minnesota, USA, one prairie and one forest site, were used to assess the generality of our results. The first three treatments did not significantly influence observed fungal operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness or community structure at either site. Physical pooling captured more OTU richness compared to individual samples, but total OTU richness at each site was highest when individual samples were computationally combined. We conclude that standard extraction kit protocols are well optimized for fungal HTS surveys, but because sample pooling can significantly influence OTU richness estimates, it is important to carefully consider the study aims when planning sampling procedures.


This data set consists of four data files. The FASTA file, Representative OTU sequences.fa, contains representative sequences from the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) shown in the OTU table. FASTA files can be opened in simple text editors, and sequences can be aligned using the BLAST tool (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) or open source software, like AliView (http://www.ormbunkar.se/aliview/). There are two Excel data files: OTU table and heatmaps.xlsx and Diversity Indexes.xlsx. The former contains the raw abundance data for the observed OTUs from the different experimental sites. The latter is a breakdown of various diversity indices that are grouped based on experimental characteristics, such as extraction volume, extraction method, etc. Excel_Archive.zip is a compressed version of the two Excel data files that have been converted to more archival-friendly formats using Excel Archival Tool.

Referenced by

Related to



Funding information

USDA 2011-67019-30200
University of Minnesota MnDrive
NSF Grants EF 12-41895
NSF Long-Term Ecological Research Network 0620652




Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Song, Zewei; Schlatter, Dan; Kennedy, Peter; Kinkel, Linda; Kistler, H.Corby; Nguyen, Nhu; Bates, Scott. (2015). Effort Versus Reward: Preparing samples for fungal community characterization in high-throughput sequencing surveys of soils. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), http://dx.doi.org/10.13020/D6301Q.
View/Download file
File View/OpenDescriptionSize
Representative OTU sequences.faFASTA file of fungal sequence groups469.43 KB
OTU table and heatmaps.xlsxSpreadsheet summarizing sample sources and species composition627.5 KB
Diversity Indexes.xlsxSpreadsheet showing diversity of samples16.34 KB
Excel_ArchiveZIP archive version of Excel files1008.83 KB
READMEDescription of data set59.78 KB

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.