The Presidential Concession Speech: How Candidates Manage Defeat in an Era of Growing Partisan Polarization

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Presidential Concession Speech: How Candidates Manage Defeat in an Era of Growing Partisan Polarization

Published Date

2018

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

Commonly explored in the discipline of political science, partisan polarization is an inherently discursive phenomenon that is ripe for rhetorical analysis. This study investigates how political candidates manage the polarization surrounding the electoral process by focusing on the concession speech, which is a ritualistic and highly emotional rhetorical event. Specifically, I examine two contrastive cases of speeches delivered in low and high polarization contexts: respectively, the concession speech of Walter Mondale (1984) and that of Hillary Clinton (2016). In this essay, I show how Mondale, engages in image-maintaining rhetoric while Clinton removes herself from the context and makes numerous appeals to her supporters to uphold their partisan movement, even as both candidates cope with the challenges of polarization. My rhetorical analysis reveals that each speech acts as a unique model for managing polarization, in addition to reaffirming the the role of the concession speech as a genre with major significance in the electoral process.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Hegland, Austin. (2018). The Presidential Concession Speech: How Candidates Manage Defeat in an Era of Growing Partisan Polarization. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/198741.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.