A comparison of pseudo-Bayesian and joint maximum likelihood procedures for estimating item parameters in the three-parameter IRT model
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
A comparison of pseudo-Bayesian and joint maximum likelihood procedures for estimating item parameters in the three-parameter IRT model
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1989
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
This study compared pseudo-Bayesian and joint
maximum likelihood procedures for estimating item
parameters for the three-parameter logistic model in
item response theory. Two programs, ASCAL and
LOGIST, which employ the two methods were compared
using data simulated from a three-parameter
model. Item responses were generated for sample sizes
of 2,000 and 500, test lengths of 35 and 15, and examinees
of high, medium, and low ability. The results
showed that the item characteristic curves estimated by
the two methods were more similar to each other than
to the generated item characteristic curves. Pseudo-Bayesian estimation consistently produced more accurate
item parameter estimates for the smaller sample
size, whereas joint maximum likelihood was more accurate
as test length was reduced. Index terms:
ASCAL, item response theory, joint maximum likelihood
estimation, LOGIST, parameter estimation, pseudo-Bayesian estimation, three-parameter model.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Skaggs, Gary & Stevenson, José. (1989). A comparison of pseudo-Bayesian and joint maximum likelihood procedures for estimating item parameters in the three-parameter IRT model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 13, 391-402. doi:10.1177/014662168901300405
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168901300405
Suggested citation
Skaggs, Gary; Stevenson, José. (1989). A comparison of pseudo-Bayesian and joint maximum likelihood procedures for estimating item parameters in the three-parameter IRT model. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107449.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.