Item format and the structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Item format and the structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory

Alternative title

Published Date

1984

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Two versions of the Personal Orientation Inventory were administered to 317 subjects. One version employed the standard two-choice response format. The other version used a six-choice response format. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine if a multiple- response format resulted in improved psychometric properties, (2) to compare the component structure of the two versions, and (3) to compare the empirically derived scales with the theoretically defined scales. The results showed a slight improvement for the multiple- response format, but with poorly defined component patterns. The change in format resulted in a change in component structure. The components derived from both versions did not correspond to the theoretical scales. An analysis indicated that the only well-defined component from either response format could be interpreted as measuring social desirability responding rather than measuring content. A follow-up questionnaire indicated greater subject acceptance of the six-choice version.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Velicer, Wayne F, DiClemente, Carlo C & Corriveau, Donald P. (1984). Item format and the structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 8, 409-419. doi:10.1177/014662168400800405

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168400800405

Suggested citation

Velicer, Wayne F.; DiClemente, Carlo C.; Corriveau, Donald P.. (1984). Item format and the structure of the Personal Orientation Inventory. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101956.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.