An Experimental Examination of Misconception Corrections Across Health Domains and Potential Backfire Effect

Damsgard, Erika
2020-05-29
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Damsgard_Plan B_Debunking Misconceptions_Final.pdf (2.22 MB)

Persistent link to this item

https://hdl.handle.net/11299/213854
Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

An Experimental Examination of Misconception Corrections Across Health Domains and Potential Backfire Effect

Authors

Published Date

2020-05-29

Publisher

Type

Scholarly Text or Essay

Abstract

The endorsement of misconceptions, unlike ignorance, may be deep-rooted (Hammer, 1996) and can be challenging to correct (Walter & Murphy, 2018). These erroneous beliefs are prevalent in a variety of areas, including several health domains (e.g., vaccinations; complementary and alternative medicine; diet and exercise; and mental health) and may lead to harmful consequences. Unfortunately, efforts to reduce misconceptions may, in some circumstances, result in backfire effects, whereby incorrect information is misremembered as fact (Lewandowsky et al., 2012). This study aimed to examine the effects of myth debunking posters formatted based upon an actual flu vaccination campaign (CDC, n.d.) and applied to multiple health-related domains. Moreover, a potential backfire effect stemming from presentation format was investigated. Using a 3 (poster condition) x 2 (time of assessment) between subject factorial experimental design, 218 participants completed one of six conditions: (a) Myths and Facts - immediate, (b) Facts Only - immediate, (c) Control - immediate, (d) Myths and Facts - delay, (e) Facts Only - delay, and (f) Control - delay. There was a significant and large main effect for poster condition on overall accurate knowledge, as well as for each targeted domain, in which those in the Myths and Facts and Facts Only conditions accurately identified significantly more information than the Control Condition. No backfire effect for poster format nor illusion of truth effect was detected. Behavioral intentions were less obvious and revealed a more mixed pattern. Overall, the present data suggests that the format used to correct misinformation may be less important than the act of refuting. Future research will benefit from increasing delay periods, increasing variability in populations of myth debunking, expanding response format when measuring misconceptions, and translating increased knowledge to behavioral intentions (and change).

Keywords

Description

A Plan B Research Project submitted to the faculty of the University of Minnesota by Erika Damsgard in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, May 2020. Advisor: Rick LaCaille.

Related to

Replaces

License

Collections

Master's Degree Culminating Works
Master of Arts in Psychological Science, in Educational Psychology, and in Counseling Psychology Plan B Project Papers

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Damsgard, Erika. (2020). An Experimental Examination of Misconception Corrections Across Health Domains and Potential Backfire Effect. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/213854.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.