Minnesota Low Volume Road Design 1998

Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title


Minnesota Low Volume Road Design 1998

Published Date



Minnesota Department of Transportation




In this project, researchers examined the current practices that local agencies use and evaluated the thickness design procedures by comparing predicted lives for the current designs with those obtained from the mechanistic-empirical design procedure ROADENT. Researchers determined current practices by sending a questionnaire to all cities and counties and visiting two counties and one city. In general, the questionnaire responses show that cities and counties use a variety of practices for the design, construction, and management of low volume pavements in Minnesota. Relative to the current designs, ROADENT predictions of fatigue behavior require a thicker design for medium and high-traffic roads than the Soil Factor design, and a thicker design for high-traffic roads than the R-Value procedure. The required thicknesses based on development of rut depth are not consistent with the current designs. To develop consistent procedures for the design, construction, and management of low volume roads in Minnesota, the report recommends converting the differences in performance predictions to thicknesses through the use of existing procedures and the mechanistic-empirical procedure; developing a best practices manual; and implementing the design procedure and manual.


Related to




Series/Report Number

Funding information

Minnesota Department of Transportation

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Skok, Eugene L.; Newcomb, Dave; Timm, David H.. (1999). Minnesota Low Volume Road Design 1998. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/152983.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.