Some contrasts between maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Some contrasts between maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1990
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
The fundamental mathematical model of Thurstone’s
common factor analysis is reviewed. The basic
covariance matrices of maximum likelihood factor
analysis (MLFA) and alpha factor analysis (AFA) are
presented. Putting aside the principles on which they
are based, these two methods are compared in terms
of a number of computational and scaling contrasts
following from the application of their respective developments.
The paper concludes with a discussion of
the number-of-factors problem, the weighting problem
in MLFA and AFA, and possible bases for a choice between
the two. Index terms: alpha factor analysis,
common factor analysis, maximum likelihood factor
analysis, number of common factors, scaling and
weighting in common factor analysis.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Kaiser, Henry F & Derflinger, Gerhard. (1990). Some contrasts between maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 29-32. doi:10.1177/014662169001400103
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662169001400103
Suggested citation
Kaiser, Henry F.; Derflinger, Gerhard. (1990). Some contrasts between maximum likelihood factor analysis and alpha factor analysis. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/107735.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.