Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

The Mokken scale: A critical discussion

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Mokken scale: A critical discussion

Published Date

1986

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

The Mokken scale is critically discussed. It is argued that Loevinger’s H, adapted by Mokken and advocated as a coefficient of scalability, is sensitive to properties of the item set which are extraneous to Mokken’s requirement of holomorphy of item response curves. Therefore, when defined in terms of H, the Mokken scale is ambiguous. It is furthermore argued that item-selection free statistical inferences concerning the latent person order appear to be insufficiently based on double monotony alone, and that the Rasch model is the only item response model fulfilling this requirement. Finally, it is contended that the Mokken scale is an unfruitful compromise between the requirements of a Guttman scale and the requirements of classical test theory.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Roskam, Edward E, Van den Wollenberg, Arnold L & Jansen, Paul G. (1986). The Mokken scale: A critical discussion. Applied Psychological Measurement, 10, 265-277. doi:10.1177/014662168601000305

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168601000305

Suggested citation

Roskam, Edward E.; Van den Wollenberg, Arnold L.; Jansen, Paul G. W.. (1986). The Mokken scale: A critical discussion. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102773.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.