Why States Enact Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Renewable Portfolio Standards in Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas

2012-08-27
Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Why States Enact Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Renewable Portfolio Standards in Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas

Published Date

2012-08-27

Publisher

Type

Thesis or Dissertation

Abstract

In light of the failure of the federal government to enact substantial environmental policies, many states have passed their own legislation addressing these concerns. One common policy is a Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS), which requires retail electric utilities within a state to produce a certain percentage of their electricity from renewable energy sources. However, not all states have enacted an RPS or other form of environmental legislation. Three theories have emerged to attempt to explain why this is the case; these three theories can be referred to as political ideology, regional diffusion and internal determinants. This paper explores the political factors that led to RPS programs in Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas in hopes of revealing which of these three theories is most convincing. The discovery is that political ideology does play a role in environmental legislative success at the state level, while regional diffusion does not emerge as a significant factor in these three cases. What appears to be most telling are the unique internal determinants of each state that interacted during the legislative process of RPS development.

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Suggested citation

Case, Samuel. (2012). Why States Enact Environmental Legislation: An Examination of Renewable Portfolio Standards in Massachusetts, Minnesota and Texas. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/132122.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.