Knowledge of results and the proportion of positive feedback on tests of ability
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Knowledge of results and the proportion of positive feedback on tests of ability
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1979
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Students were administered one of three
conventional or one of three stradaptive vocabulary
tests with or without knowledge of results (KR).
The three tests of each type differed in the expected
proportion of correct responses to the test items
and thus in the expected proportion of positive
feedback. Results indicated that the mean maximum-
likelihood estimates of individuals’ abilities
varied as a joint function of KR-provision and test
difficulty. Students receiving KR scored highest on
the most-difficult test and lowest on the least-difficult
test; students receiving no KR scored highest
on the least-difficult test and did most poorly on
the most-difficult test. Although the students perceived
the differences in test difficulty, there were
no effects on mean student anxiety or motivation
scores attributable to difficulty or proportion of
positive feedback alone. Regardless of the proportion
of positive feedback, students reacted very
favorably to receiving KR, and its provision increased
the mean level of reported motivation.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Prestwood, J. Stephen. (1979). Knowledge of results and the proportion of positive feedback on tests of ability. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, 155-160. doi:10.1177/014662167900300202
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662167900300202
Suggested citation
Prestwood, J. Stephen. (1979). Knowledge of results and the proportion of positive feedback on tests of ability. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/99575.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.