Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

Signature Wood Modifications that Reveal Decomposer Community History

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Statistics
View Statistics

Collection period

5/1/13
12/31/14

Date completed

1/30/15

Date updated

Time period coverage

2013-2014

Geographic coverage

Source information

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Signature Wood Modifications that Reveal Decomposer Community History

Published Date

2015-02-13

Group

Author Contact

Schilling, Jonathan
schillin@umn.edu

Type

Dataset
Field Study Data
Experimental Data

Abstract

Correlating plant litter decay rates with initial tissue traits (e.g. C, N contents) is common practice, but in woody litter, predictive relationships are often weak. Variability in predicting wood decomposition is partially due to territorial competition among fungal decomposers that, in turn, have a range of nutritional strategies (rot types) and consequences on residues. Given this biotic influence, researchers are increasingly using culture-independent tools in an attempt to link variability more directly to decomposer groups. Our goal was to complement these tools by using certain wood modifications as 'signatures' that provide more functional information about decomposer dominance than density loss. Specifically, we used dilute alkali solubility (DAS; higher for brown rot) and lignin:density loss (L:D; higher for white rot) to infer rot type (binary) and fungal nutritional mode (gradient), respectively. We first determined strength of pattern among 29 fungi of known rot type by correlating DAS and L:D with mass loss in birch and pine. Having shown robust relationships for both techniques above a density loss threshold, we then demonstrated and resolved two issues relevant to species consortia and field trials, 1) spatial patchiness creating gravimetric bias (density bias), and 2) brown rot imprints prior or subsequent to white rot replacement (legacy effects). Finally, we field-tested our methods in a New Zealand Pinus radiata plantation in a paired-plot comparison. Overall, results validate these lowcost techniques that measure the collective histories of decomposer dominance in wood. The L:D measure also showed clear potential in classifying 'rot type' along a spectrum rather than as a traditional binary type (brown versus white rot), as it places the nutritional strategies of wood-degrading fungi on a scale (L:D=0-5, in this case). These information-rich measures of consequence can provide insight into their biological causes, strengthening the links between traits, structure, and function during wood decomposition.

Description

Referenced by

Schilling, JS, Kaffenberger, JT, Liew, FJ, Song, Z. (2015). Signature Wood Modifications Reveal Decomposer Community History. PLoS ONE 10(3): e0120679.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120679

Related to

Replaces

item.page.isreplacedby

License

Publisher

Funding information

Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; Sabbatical funding from University of Minnesota

item.page.sponsorshipfunderid

item.page.sponsorshipfundingagency

item.page.sponsorshipgrant

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Schilling, Jonathan. (2015). Signature Wood Modifications that Reveal Decomposer Community History. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota (DRUM), http://dx.doi.org/10.13020/D66P4P.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.