An alternative approach for IRT observed-score equating of number-correct scores

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

An alternative approach for IRT observed-score equating of number-correct scores

Published Date

1995

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

An alternative approach for item response theory observed-score equating is described. The number-correct score distributions needed in equating are found by numerical integration over the theoretical or empirical distributions of examinees’ traits. The item response theory true-score equating method and the observed-score equating method described by Lord, in which the number-correct score distributions are summed over a sample of trait estimates, are compared in a real test example. In a computer simulation, the observed-score equating methods based on numerical integration and summation were compared using data generated from standard normal and skewed populations. The method based on numerical integration was found to be less biased, especially at the two ends of the score distribution. This method can be implemented without the need to estimate trait level for individual examinees, and it is less computationally intensive than the method based on summation. Index terms: equating, item response theory, numerical integration, observed-score equating.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Zeng, Lingjia & Kolen, Michael J. (1995). An alternative approach for IRT observed-score equating of number-correct scores. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 231-240. doi:10.1177/014662169501900302

Suggested citation

Zeng, Lingjia; Kolen, Michael J.. (1995). An alternative approach for IRT observed-score equating of number-correct scores. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/118280.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.