A zero-one programming approach to Gulliksen's matched random subtests method
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
A zero-one programming approach to Gulliksen's matched random subtests method
Published Date
1988
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
Gulliksen’s matched random subtests method is a
graphical method to split a test into parallel test
halves. The method has practical relevance because it
maximizes coefficient α as a lower bound to the classical
test reliability coefficient. In this paper the same
problem is formulated as a zero-one programming
problem, the advantage being that it can be solved by
computer algorithms that already exist. It is shown
how the procedure can be generalized to split tests of
any length. The paper concludes with an empirical example
comparing Gulliksen’s original hand-method
with the zero-one programming version. Index
terms: Classical test theory, Gulliksen’s matched random
subtests method, Item matching, Linear programming,
Parallel tests, Test reliability, Zero-one programming.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Van der Linden, Wim J & Boekkooi-Timminga, Ellen. (1988). A zero-one programming approach to Gulliksen's matched random subtests method. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 201-209. doi:10.1177/014662168801200210
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168801200210
Suggested citation
Van der Linden, Wim J.; Boekkooi-Timminga, Ellen. (1988). A zero-one programming approach to Gulliksen's matched random subtests method. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/104226.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.