Dichotomous and multipoint scales using bipolar adjectives

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

View/Download File

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

Dichotomous and multipoint scales using bipolar adjectives

Alternative title

Published Date

1983

Publisher

Type

Article

Abstract

Subjects responded to a set of self-descriptive bipolar adjectives in either a dichotomous format or a 7-point bipolar rating scale format. In addition, each subject answered a measure of social desirability responding rate The responses of over 400 subjects in each format were factor analyzed, followed by a varimax rotation The factor structure for the formats were strikingly similar and closely reflected the traits represented by the adjectives. Social desirability was found to be of minimal influence for either format. However, the factors derived from the multipoint format were slightly clearer and accounted for more variance. In addition, trait measures produced by the sum of four adjective scales from a common content dimension were more internally consistent using the multipoint format.

Keywords

Description

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

King, Lynda A, King, Daniel W & Klockars, Alan J. (1983). Dichotomous and multipoint scales using bipolar adjectives. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 173-180. doi:10.1177/014662168300700205

Other identifiers

doi:10.1177/014662168300700205

Suggested citation

King, Lynda A.; King, Daniel W.; Klockars, Alan J.. (1983). Dichotomous and multipoint scales using bipolar adjectives. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101641.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.