Some observations on the metric of PC-BILOG results
1990
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Some observations on the metric of PC-BILOG results
Authors
Published Date
1990
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
The computer program PC-BILOG uses the
estimated posterior θ distribution to establish the
location and metric of the θ scale. This approach
to solving the identification problem has not been
examined extensively. Consequently, this study
investigated the equating of PC-BILOG results to an
underlying metric when a two-parameter IRT model
was used. The simulation results showed that the
means of the estimated item and θ parameters
generally were insensitive to characteristics of the
prior distribution on the item discriminations. The
finding of greatest interest was that the PC-BILOG
procedures preserved the variability of true θ distributions
having small variances while standardizing
the variability of those having large variances.
However, in both cases the results could be equated
to the true metric using existing techniques.
Index terms: ability metric, Bayesian estimation, BILOG,
equating, item response theory, prior distributions.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Baker, Frank B. (1990). Some observations on the metric of PC-BILOG results. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 139-150. doi:10.1177/014662169001400203
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662169001400203
Suggested citation
Baker, Frank B.. (1990). Some observations on the metric of PC-BILOG results. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/113255.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.