Linked raters' judgments: Combating problems of statistical conclusion validity
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
Linked raters' judgments: Combating problems of statistical conclusion validity
Published Date
1983
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
The traditional procedure for obtaining judged ratings,
to ascertain if treatment-related change has occurred,
involves the randomization of the materials to
be rated. An alternative approach (linked judgments)
is investigated as a potential solution to certain instrumentation-
related threats to statistical conclusion validity
of the incumbent rating procedure. Data from a
weight reduction study are presented which suggest
that linked raters’ judgments provide both a more
powerful and a more valid index of treatment effectiveness
than the traditional procedure.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Howard, George S, Obledo, Fernando H, Cole, David A & Maxwell, Scott E. (1983). Linked raters' judgments: Combating problems of statistical conclusion validity. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 57-62. doi:10.1177/014662168300700108
Suggested citation
Howard, George S.; Obledo, Fernando H.; Cole, David A.; Maxwell, Scott E.. (1983). Linked raters' judgments: Combating problems of statistical conclusion validity. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/101625.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.