Assessment of the Impacts of Various Grazing Management Strategies on Southern Minnesota Stream Channels

Abstract

Stream riparian corridors are inherent to many farms in southern Minnesota. They are complex and diverse ecosystems, provide transportation for drainage from agricultural fields, and contribute to the quality of the larger watershed to which they belong. However, much of the 3.5 million miles of rivers in the United States are impacted, with sedimentation and excess nutrients being the most significant causes of degradation. The agricultural areas of southern Minnesota commonly use stream corridors as pasture since they are generally unsuitable for crops and provide a natural source of water for livestock. Traditional methods of grazing livestock can cause reduced vegetative cover, compacted soils, water contamination, sedimentation, and eroded banks. Managing livestock by limiting the location and duration of their grazing has seen some success in reducing the impact compared to conventional grazing methods. My research aims to further determine the impacts various grazing management strategies have had on streams. Geomorphic data from four sites across three streams are analyzed to evaluate effects of current grazing strategies and changes in grazing strategies. Grassed and wooded areas are also compared, as grazing directly influences the vegetative communities. The results suggest that both managed and grazing exclusion sites showed healthier channels than conventional grazing sites did, and that grassed bank areas contribute more to channel stability than wooded bank areas. In certain situations, managed grazing has the potential to be more beneficial to stream channel health than the prohibition of grazing.