Between Dec 19, 2024 and Jan 2, 2025, datasets can be submitted to DRUM but will not be processed until after the break. Staff will not be available to answer email during this period, and will not be able to provide DOIs until after Jan 2. If you are in need of a DOI during this period, consider Dryad or OpenICPSR. Submission responses to the UDC may also be delayed during this time.
 

The Influence of Feedback Statement Sequence and a Challenging Goal on Task Performance

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Persistent link to this item

Statistics
View Statistics

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Title

The Influence of Feedback Statement Sequence and a Challenging Goal on Task Performance

Published Date

2016-05

Publisher

Type

Scholarly Text or Essay

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the use of combined positive and corrective feedback statements to improve performance in the presence of a challenging “stretch” goal. A within-subjects design was used to expose participants to four feedback statement sequences: (1) no feedback, (2) PCP (positive, corrective, positive), (3) CPP (corrective, positive, positive), and (4) PPC (positive, positive, corrective). Providing participants with a combination of positive and corrective feedback statements, regardless of sequence, was hypothesized to lead to higher task performance than not providing feedback. In addition, although PCP (i.e., the feedback “sandwich”) is the most well known feedback statement sequence, no differences among the variations of statement sequencing were hypothesized. Ad hoc analyses were conducted to examine the most preferred feedback statement sequence and type of feedback (positive or corrective), as well as the influence that core self-evaluation, job satisfaction, goal commitment, and stress on performance. Results revealed that (1) task performance was higher (overall) when feedback was provided versus when no feedback was provided and (2) statistically significant difference in task performance did not exist across the three feedback statement sequences. Despite no differential effects on performance, 47% of participants identified the session during which they received the CPP feedback statement sequence as their most preferred. Further, 53% of participants self-reported they preferred positive feedback, while 25% preferred corrective feedback. Individual preferences for feedback statement sequences support the need for open communication between the feedback receiver and provider to increase task performance.

Description

A Plan B Research Project Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Minnesota by Areanna Marie Lakowske in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degreee of Master of Arts, May 2016. This item has been modified from the original to remove the signature page present.

Related to

Replaces

License

Series/Report Number

Funding information

University of Minnesota, Duluth. College of Education and Human Service Professions.

Isbn identifier

Doi identifier

Previously Published Citation

Other identifiers

Suggested citation

Lakowske, Areanna M. (2016). The Influence of Feedback Statement Sequence and a Challenging Goal on Task Performance. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/198192.

Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.