The analysis of item-ability regr essions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool
Loading...
View/Download File
Persistent link to this item
Statistics
View StatisticsJournal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Title
The analysis of item-ability regr essions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool
Alternative title
Authors
Published Date
1985
Publisher
Type
Article
Abstract
The use of item-ability regressions (the comparison
of the regression of the observed proportion of people
answering an item correctly on estimated &thetas; with the
estimated item response function) to investigate the
psychometric properties of particular item types in a
given population was explored using data from four
administrations of 10 item types (a total of 806 items)
from the Graduate Record Examinations General Test.
Although the method does not allow an absolute determination
of fit for a latent trait model (in this case, for
the three-parameter logistic model), it does show that
certain item types consistently fit the model worse
than other item types, and it led to and supported a
specific hypothesis as to why the model probably did
not fit these item types.
Keywords
Description
Related to
Replaces
License
Series/Report Number
Funding information
Isbn identifier
Doi identifier
Previously Published Citation
Kingston, Neal M & Dorans, Neil J. (1985). The analysis of item-ability regr essions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 281-288. doi:10.1177/014662168500900306
Other identifiers
doi:10.1177/014662168500900306
Suggested citation
Kingston, Neal M.; Dorans, Neil J.. (1985). The analysis of item-ability regr essions: An exploratory IRT model fit tool. Retrieved from the University Digital Conservancy, https://hdl.handle.net/11299/102182.
Content distributed via the University Digital Conservancy may be subject to additional license and use restrictions applied by the depositor. By using these files, users agree to the Terms of Use. Materials in the UDC may contain content that is disturbing and/or harmful. For more information, please see our statement on harmful content in digital repositories.